What Kind of Injuries Do You Need in Order to Not Be Able to Walk Again

• Journal Listing
• Front Hum Neurosci
• v.8; 2014
• PMC3952432

Front Hum Neurosci. 2014; eight: 141.

Who is going to walk? A review of the factors influencing walking recovery afterward spinal cord injury

Giorgio Scivoletto

¹Spinal Cord Unit, IRCCS Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome, Italy

²Clinical and Enquiry Move Analysis Lab, Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome, Italy

Federica Tamburella

¹Spinal Cord Unit, IRCCS Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome, Italy

²Clinical and Research Move Analysis Lab, Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome, Italy

Letizia Laurenza

^aneSpinal String Unit, IRCCS Fondazione South. Lucia, Rome, Italia

Monica Torre

¹Spinal String Unit, IRCCS Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome, Italy

Marco Molinari

¹Spinal Cord Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Due south. Lucia, Rome, Italia

²Clinical and Inquiry Movement Analysis Lab, Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome, Italia

Received 2013 Dec 4; Accepted 2014 February 26.

Abstract

The recovery of walking part is considered of farthermost relevance both past patients and physicians. Consequently, in the recent years, recovery of locomotion become a major objective of new pharmacological and rehabilitative interventions. In the last decade, several pharmacological treatment and rehabilitative approaches take been initiated to enhance locomotion chapters of SCI patients. Basic scientific discipline advances in regeneration of the central nervous system concur hope of further neurological and functional recovery to be studied in clinical trials. Therefore, a precise noesis of the natural course of walking recovery after SCI and of the factors affecting the prognosis for recovery has become mandatory. In the present work we reviewed the prognostic factors for walking recovery, with item attention paid to the clinical ones (neurological examination at admission, age, etiology gender, time course of recovery). The prognostic value of some instrumental examinations has besides been reviewed. Based on these factors nosotros propose that a reliable prognosis for walking recovery is possible. Instrumental examinations, in item evoked potentials could be useful to improve the prognosis.

Keywords: spinal cord injury, walking recovery, prognostic factors

Introduction

Walking recovery is one of the main goals of patients afterwards SCI: walking is rated at first identify (together with float and bowel function) at to the lowest degree by patients with incomplete lesions (Ditunno et al., 2008a). Furthermore, an epidemiological written report shows an increase of the number of patients with incomplete lesions (e.thousand., with chances of walking recovery) (Pagliacci et al., 2003). Therefore, the recovery of ambulation has get the target of several pharmacological and rehabilitative approaches (Wernig and Muller, 1992; Domingo et al., 2012) and a precise evaluation of the natural recovery of walking and of the prognostic factors influencing this function has become mandatory (Steeves et al., 2007).

In the present work we reviewed the effect of several clinical and demographic features on the prognosis for walking recovery. Furthermore, considering one of the chief problems of the astute stage of SCI is the lack of reliable examinations, we considered the prognostic value of neurophysiological and neuroimaging examinations.

Finally, the effect of early pharmacological and surgical interventions on walking recovery will be examined.

Materials and methods

A systematic search was performed of all papers also every bit websites mentioning spinal cord injury and walking The literature search was conducted without time limits to place papers that explicitly mentioned the walking chapters in patients with SCI. Databases included PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Cochrane Primal Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus, which includes Embase citations. All study designs, including case reports, were included, with no restrictions on the ages of participants. Not-English language articles and beast studies were excluded. The following search terms were used: prognosis prediction, SCI, paraplegia/tetraplegia/quadriplegia, ambulation/gait and walking/walking capacity. In addition, other databases, such equally Google and a mitt search of Spinal Cord yielded other citations not identified past the above strategy.

2 authors (Giorgio Scivoletto and Federica Tamburella) independently identified and classified the papers through a review of the abstracts, texts, and references and circulated them to the authors' panel.

Clinical examination

The nigh relevant prognostic factor for functional recovery in SCI patients is the neurological status at the moment of the starting time examination. The physical examination of these patients has been standardized past the American Spinal Injury Clan in the International Standards for Neurological Nomenclature of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) (American Spinal Injury Clan, 2000). Based on this test it is possible to establish the neurological level of injury, too equally the severity of the lesion (damage). Components also include a rectal examination for voluntary anal contraction and anal sensation (Figures ​ 1, ​ 2). Patients are considered to take a complete lesion (AIS impairment A), co-ordinate to the ASIA Damage Scale (AIS), in the absence of sensory or motor function at the everyman sacral segments. Incomplete lesions are defined when sensation and/or motor function are preserved beneath the neurologic level of injury, and in particular in the lowest sacral segments (anal sensation, including deep anal force per unit area and voluntary external anal sphincter contraction) (Effigy ​ two).

Scoring sheet for the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. American Spinal Injury Clan: International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, revised 2013; Atlanta, GA. Reprinted 2013.

Scoring sheet for the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. American Spinal Injury Association: International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal String Injury, revised 2013; Atlanta, GA. Reprinted 2013.

This examination should usually exist performed at 72 h after the lesion because this timing seems to have a more accurate prognostic value than earlier assessment (Herbison et al., 1991).

AIS grade conversion and walking recovery

For the aim of this review nosotros would define walking recovery as the regained power to walk independently in the community, with or without the use of devices and braces. This is also defined "functional walking" and has been described past several authors (Hussey and Stauffer, 1973) as the capacity to walk reasonable distances both in and out of abode unassisted by another person.

For a long time AIS course conversion has been considered the footing to predict the possibility of achieving functional walking. Nevertheless, a recent article past van Middendorp et al. (2009) questioned the relationship between AIS class conversion and ability to walk as nosotros will evidence beneath.

Patients with AIS impairment A (motor and sensory complete lesion) at their beginning examination have very few chances of neurological recovery below the lesion. When the examination is performed at 72 h post-injury, 80% of the initial AIS A patients remain as AIS A, with about 10% converting to AIS B (i.e., some sensory function) and nearly 10% converting to AIS C (with some motor recovery below the lesion) (Burns et al., 2012). Still, if the first exam is performed later, the pct of improvement decreases dramatically to 2.5% (Scivoletto et al., 2004a) (Table ​ i). Accordingly, the possibility of patients with AIS impairment A of achieving functional walking is very limited too. Furthermore, likewise between the patients who converted to an incomplete lesion but 14% recovered some walking function (van Middendorp et al., 2009). The AIS A patients who achieve some walking role usually are low thoracic or lumbar levels (T12-L3) and need braces and devices to walk (Ditunno et al., 2008b; Table ​ two). Finally, these patients are usually express ambulators, with slow average velocities and great energy expenditure (Vaccaro et al., 1997).

Tabular array 1

Prediction of recovery according to AIS impairment scale.

AIS grade at admission	A	B	C	D
First examination at 72 h10	One-year follow-up AIS grade
A	84%	eight%	v%	3%
B	x%	xxx%	29%	31%
C	2%	2%	25%	67%
D	2%	1%	ii%	85%
First examination at 30 days11	One-year follow-upwards AIS grade
A	95%	0	2,5%	2,5%
B	0	53%	21%	26%
C	1%	0	45%	54%
D	2%	0	0	96%

Table 2

Prediction of functional walking according to AIS impairment and other features.

AIS/lesion level at access	Functional walking/authors (references)
AIS A/cervical lesion	0% (Waters et al., 1994a,b)
	0% (Ditunno et al., 2008b)
AIS A/thoracic and lumbar lesions	v% (Waters et al., 1994a,b)
	8.5% (Ditunno et al., 2008b)
AIS at admission and awareness	% recovery of community ambulation at 1 year mail-injury/authors (references)
AIS B (only light impact preservation)	0% (Waters et al., 1994a,b)
	11% (Crozier et al., 1991)
	33% (Waters et al., 1994a,b)
AIS B (lite touch + pin prick preservation)	89% (Crozier et al., 1991)
	66% (Foo et al., 1981)
	75% (Katoh and el Masry, 1995)
AIS at admission and age	% recovery of customs ambulation at 1 yr post-injury/authors (references)
AIS C < 50 years	91% (Burns et al., 1997)
	71% (Scivoletto et al., 2003)
AIS C > 50 years	42% (Burns et al., 1997)
	25% (Scivoletto et al., 2003)
AIS D < 50 years	100% (Burns et al., 1997)
	100% (Scivoletto et al., 2003)
AIS D > 50 years	100% (Burns et al., 1997)
	eighty% (Scivoletto et al., 2003)

AIS class B patients (those with motor complete, sensory incomplete lesion at 72 h test) usually prove some motor recovery and they can convert to AIS C or even AIS D grade. However, the overall recovery of airing is considered to be about 33% (Katoh and el Masry, 1995; van Middendorp et al., 2009). The per centum of walking recovery may vary depending on the modality of the sensation spared at the everyman sacral segments. Several studies reported a relationship between pinprick preservation and recovery in AIS B patients. AIS grade B patients with pinprick preservation take a amend walking recovery than those with light touch just (Foo et al., 1981; Crozier et al., 1991; Waters et al., 1994a; Katoh and el Masry, 1995; Oleson et al., 2005) (Table ​ 2). This finding has an anatomical ground at the spinal cord level. The preservation of pinprick perception together with calorie-free bear upon ane indicates less extensive impairment to the spino-thalamic tracts and posterior column. Therefore, in these cases, there is a high likelihood of some sparing of the motor pathways conveyed by the nearby cortico-spinal tracts (Oleson et al., 2005).

Motor incomplete (AIS C) patients have a meliorate prognosis for walking recovery than sensory incomplete ones. The overall charge per unit of recovery is virtually 75% (Maynard et al., 1979; Crozier et al., 1992; Waters et al., 1994b; van Middendorp et al., 2009). This percentage includes both the patients who converted to AIS D and those who remained AIS C but achieve at to the lowest degree some walking function (van Middendorp et al., 2009); these patients probably have low thoracic or lumbar lesions and walk with braces and devices. Several factors may influence the risk of walking recovery in these patients: lower extremity force, motor recovery timing, age and upper extremity forcefulness for tetraplegic patients are the most important ones (Crozier et al., 1992; Waters et al., 1994b). In AIS C patients age seems to be a strong prognostic gene for walking recovery. Age represents a clear negative prognostic gene for walking recovery: AIS C subjects younger than fifty years have a hazard of achieving functional walking of 80–90%, but this pct dramatically decreases to 30–twoscore% in older patients (Table ​ 2) (Perot and Vera, 1982; Foo, 1986; Burns et al., 1997; Scivoletto et al., 2003). Different hypotheses have been offered to explicate the negative effect of historic period. The functional potential for a given neurological deficit is lower at older age; this may be considered reasonable since functional abilities generally reject as people'southward age increases. In normal ageing "reserve (peak) capacity" (or "vitality") (DiGiovanna, 2000) seems to peak at around 30 years of age, and then gradually declines until death. Illness processes, including SCI and its complications, are considered to advance this procedure of decline. Jakob et al. (2009) offers another possible explanation. In his study he found that historic period is not correlated with neurologic recovery, but is correlated with a worse functional outcome in terms of independence in daily life activities and walking function. He therefore suggested that the neurological recovery is not directly related to the functional outcome and that elderly patients have difficulties in translating neurological recovery into positive functional changes.

Finally, AIS D patients at admission have very skilful ambulation prognosis at 1 year post-injury (Burns et al., 1997; Scivoletto et al., 2003). All patients, regardless of age, who initially were classified equally AIS D (within 72 h) were able to walk at the time of belch from inpatient rehabilitation (Burns et al., 1997; van Middendorp et al., 2009).

Other clinical factors

In improver to AIS class, several other factors evaluated at 72 h afterward the lesion have been considered in the prognosis of walking recovery and are examined below.

Reflexes

In the very early test of SCI patients the presence/absence of the delayed plantar response (DPR) must be assessed. DPR is characterized by a delayed response to an unusually stiff stimulus to the sole of the foot (Weinstein et al., 1997). The onset of this response post-obit the stimulus could be 500 ms or a full second following the initiation of the stimulus (Weinstein et al., 1997). The DPR shows a reciprocal relationship with the Babinski sign and information technology is particularly relevant because it allows the prognosis during the spinal shock phase (Ko et al., 1999). The DPR is a negative prognostic indicator as it is more than often present and lasts longer (more than ane day) in SCI patients who practise not recover any voluntary motion (Weinstein et al., 1997; Ko et al., 1999).

Syndromes

Based on the distribution of sensory and motor loss, the ISNCSCI allow to identify several incomplete spinal cord syndromes with different prognostic values.

The central string syndrome (CCS) is mostly seen following cervical lesion. It represents about nine% of the total SCIs and 44% of the clinical syndromes (McKinley et al., 2007) and is characterized by a greater involvement of the upper extremities than the lower extremities. The CCS is a clinical picture that recognizes several causes (with and without os injury) and several different mechanisms (including direct injury of the spinal cord or vascular injuries) (McKinley et al., 2007) that primarily affects the center of the spinal string and generally has a favorable prognosis every bit to independence in daily life activities and bladder and bowel part recovery (Newey et al., 2000; Dvorak et al., 2005; Aito et al., 2006). Because of the lesser involvement of the lower extremities, CCS is considered to have a good prognosis for walking recovery besides (Merriam et al., 1986; Penrod et al., 1990; Roth et al., 1990; Burns et al., 1997; Aito et al., 2006). The percentage of patients who recover walking varies from 40 to 97%, but is strongly influenced past historic period. Several studies confirm that younger patients (less than 50 years old) have twice the gamble of achieving independent walking than older ones (Foo, 1986; Merriam et al., 1986; Penrod et al., 1990; Roth et al., 1990; Burns et al., 1997; Newey et al., 2000; Dvorak et al., 2005; Aito et al., 2006).

The Chocolate-brown-Séquard syndrome (BSS) is characterized by ipsilateral hemiplegia and contralateral hemianalgesia due to spinal hemisection (Brown-Sequard, 1868). It accounts for 2–4% of all traumatic SCIs and 17% of the clinical syndromes (McKinley et al., 2007). The pure form of BSS is rarely seen and the Brown-Séquard Plus Syndrome (relative ipsilateral hemiplegia with a relative contralateral hemianalgesia) is much more frequent (Roth et al., 1991). BSS is more frequent at cervical level and is usually associated with stab-wound injuries (Gentleman and Harrington, 1984). BSS is characterized by a skilful functional prognosis. Most 75% of patients accomplish independent walking at belch from rehabilitation (Stahlman and Hanley, 1992). In this framework an important predictor for walking recovery is the distribution of the impairment: if the upper limb is weaker than the lower limb, and then patients are more likely to ambulate at belch (Kirshblum and O'Connor, 1998).

The anterior cord syndrome is due to a lesion that involves the inductive 2 thirds of the spinal cord and preserves the posterior columns (Maynard et al., 1997), and account for 1% of all the SCIs and 5% of the clinical syndromes (McKinley et al., 2007). Information technology may derive from a retropulsed disc or bone fragments (Bauer and Errico, 1991), direct injury to the anterior spinal cord, or with lesions of the inductive spinal artery that provides the blood supply to that tract of spinal string (Cheshire et al., 1996). Lesions of the anterior spinal artery may outcome from diseases of the aorta, cardiac or aortic surgery, embolism, polyarteritis nodosa, or angioplasty (Cheshire et al., 1996). Anterior cord syndrome is characterized past a variable loss of motor as well every bit pinprick sensation with a relative preservation of lite touch, proprioception, and deep-pressure awareness. Due to the massive involvement of the anterior and lateral spinal cord with inclusion of the cortico-spinal tracts, only x–20% of the patients with an anterior cord syndrome accept the gamble to recover muscle role, and even in those with some recovery, usually motor strength is low and coordination is lacking; consequently these patients accept low walking recovery chances (Bohlman, 1979).

Etiology of the lesion

Most of the literature on SCI is focused on the rehabilitation of traumatic patients, despite the relevant incidence of non-traumatic lesions, considered to account for a percentage of the total SCIs varying from 30 to 80% (Buchan et al., 1972; Celani et al., 2001; Citterio et al., 2004). Patients with not-traumatic lesions differ from their traumatic counterparts for several prognostic factors. They are usually older, with a more even distribution of genders and a higher frequency of incomplete lesions. Therefore, a straight comparison of these two populations is hard (Scivoletto et al., 2011). However, when the misreckoning upshot of these factors is eliminated past means of statistics, patients with non-traumatic spinal cord lesions can achieve comparable rates of functional gains every bit their traumatic spinal cord injury counterparts (McKinley et al., 2000, 2001; Mckinley et al., 2002). With regard to walking function, recently a number of articles compared the recovery of ambulation in traumatic and non-traumatic SCIs and found that the two populations achieve comparable walking chapters with an overall percentage of patients varying from 35 (Scivoletto et al., 2011) to 49% (Marinho et al., 2012).

Gender

There are only few studies on gender related differences in neurological and functional outcomes after inpatient rehabilitation of SCI (Greenwald et al., 2001; Scivoletto et al., 2004b; Sipski et al., 2004). Two of them (Greenwald et al., 2001; Scivoletto et al., 2004b) found no pregnant differences betwixt the two genders with regard to daily life independence, motor efficiency, American Spinal Injury Clan motor scores (Greenwald et al., 2001) and walking function (Scivoletto et al., 2004b). However, Sipski et al. (2004) found gender-related differences in daily life independence, but did not specifically focus on walking recovery. Women with SCI may have more natural neurologic recovery than men, only, for a given level and degree of neurologic injury, men tend to practise better functionally than women at time of discharge from rehabilitation (Sipski et al., 2004).

Formulas and algorithms

In the concluding 3 decades several attempts have been made to link i or more than of the higher up mentioned factors (and of the results of instrumental examinations discussed beneath) to the prognosis for walking recovery.

Waters et al. (1994b) examined the relationship betwixt lower extremity strength at first examination in incomplete paraplegics and walking recovery: all patients with an initial (1-calendar month) lower extremity motor score of ≥10 points ambulated in i twelvemonth. Seventy percent of patients with an initial motor score between i and 9 ambulated at 1 year. Furthermore, all patients with an initial hip flexor or knee extensor Grade ≥2 ambulated in the community at 1 year.

The same author examined the odds of walking recovery in incomplete tetraplegics and found that, although the relationship betwixt initial lower extremity motor score and walking holds true for tetraplegics, these patients have less adventure to accomplish ambulation (Waters et al., 1994a): 63% of the patients with an initial lower extremity motor score of ≥ten points ambulated by ane yr, vs. 21% of those with an initial motor score between 1 and nine (Waters et al., 1994a). In add-on, Waters stressed the relationship between upper extremities strength and ambulation recovery in tetraplegics: patients who are community or household ambulators take meaning higher motor scores. The author linked this datum to the importance of upper extremities strength for devices utilize during walking (Waters et al., 1994a).

Crozier et al. (1992) focused on the timing of recovery of lower extremity motor strength and concluded that early recovery of quadriceps strength is an fantabulous prognostic gene for airing. All patients with an initial quadriceps strength of at to the lowest degree Grade 2/five who attained a grade of ≥3/v in at least ane quadriceps by 2 months mail service-injury accomplished functional ambulation (ability to walk independently in the community, with or without the use of devices and braces) at follow-up. However, only 25% of those who did not recover quadriceps force of iii/5 inside two months were able to walk at follow-up.

More than recently, Zörner et al. (2010) developed an algorithm based on outcome predictors and aimed at identifying subgroups of patients in the sub-astute phase who could achieve functional walking. For patients with incomplete paraplegia, lower extremity motor scores, pinprick scores and age were the all-time predictors for walking recovery. For patients with incomplete tetraplegia the more than reliable predictors were the lower extremity motor scores, the tibial SSEP score and the AIS class.

In 2011 van Middendorp et al. (2011) produced a simple clinical prediction rule based on the combination of age (<65 vs. ≥65 years), motor scores of the quadriceps femoris (L3), gastrocsoleus (S1) muscles, and light touch awareness of dermatomes L3 and S1. This rule showed an excellent bigotry capacity in recognizing patients who achieved independent airing (ability to walk independently, with or without braces and orthoses for <10 m) at follow-up from those who were dependent walkers or not-walkers.

Instrumental exam

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) (Table ​ 3)

Tabular array three

Prognostic value of SSEPs and MEPs.

	6 months walking capacity
	Normal (%)	Functional (%)	Therapeutic (%)	No walking (%)
LOWER LIMBS SSEPS AND AMBULATION (Curt and Dietz, 1997)
Intial SSEP evaluation
Normal	83	17	0	0
Present, altered	10	threescore	10	20
Absent	0	7	13	80
LOWER LIMBS MEP AND Ambulation (Curt et al., 1998)
Intial MEP evaluation
Normal	100	0	0	0
Absent	11	0	78

SSEPs are used for clinical diagnosis in patients with neurologic disease, and many studies have been performed to determine the value of SSEPs in the prediction of walking recovery in SCI patients (Immature and Dexter, 1979; Kaplan and Rosen, 1981; Young, 1985; Foo, 1986; Ziganow, 1986; Katz et al., 1991; Aalfs et al., 1993; Jacobs et al., 1995; Brusk and Dietz, 1997).

Most of these studies conclude that early SSEPs tin predict motor comeback and ambulation result in SCI patients. Nonetheless, SSEPs exercise not seem to offer additional prognostic accuracy if compared to clinical test according to the ISNCSCI for both consummate and incomplete patients (Young and Dexter, 1979; Kaplan and Rosen, 1981; Perot and Vera, 1982; Chabot et al., 1985; Katz et al., 1991; Aalfs et al., 1993; Curt and Dietz, 1997).

When a reliable clinical examination, together with the ISNCSCI is impossible (patients unresponsive, for example because sedated or under the outcome of alcohol or drugs, or uncooperative, for instance considering of pain) then SSEPs are helpful to determine if they accept SCI (Curt and Dietz, 1997). In addition, SSEPs may be helpful to differentiate between SCI and hysteric paraplegia, a differential diagnosis that may be very difficult (Kaplan et al., 1985).

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) (Tabular array ​ iii)

Transcranial magnetic stimulation allows an examination of the conductivity of the motor tracts following cortical or spinal lesions in humans. According to a study of Curt, MEPs can contribute toward diagnosing lesions of dissimilar neurologic structures within the spinal cord and in predicting the recovery of functional movements (Curt et al., 1998). The study shows that MEPs recordings are sensitive to betoken motor tract lesions in approximately 90% of SCI patients and predictive for the recovery of upper and lower limb motor office. In this sense they are of similar prognostic value to clinical examination in the prediction of functional recovery. MEPs can be used in combination with the ASIA protocol to follow the recovery of clinical motor functions in relation to that of descending motor tracts for impulse transmission. In Short'south report, MEPs were highly predictive of convalescent capacity. All patients with elicitable MEPs at initial examination recovered a musculus force of three/5 or more of the respective muscles. Not surprisingly, MEPs recordings in SCI patients are more than sensitive than SSEPs recordings for revealing the involvement of motor tract fibers and are at to the lowest degree as sensitive as the ASIA protocol in predicting the resulting functional deficit. Similarly to SSEPs, the use of MEP recordings is by and large appropriate in patients who are uncooperative (approximately 15% of patients with acute SCI) (Bozzo et al., 2011).

Magnetic resonance imaging (Tabular array ​ 4)

Table 4

MRI and lesion severity.

Authors	Results
PRESENCE OF HEMORRHAGE AT INITIAL Examination
Marciello et al., 1993	Hemorrage = low upper extremity and no lower extremity recovery
Flanders et al., 1990	Hemorrage = decreased motor power, lower motor recovery charge per unit, and fewer muscles with useful function
Ramón et al., 1997	Hemorrage = complete injury
SIZE OF HEMORRHAGE
Boldin et al., 2006;
Flanders et al., 1990;	Small hemorrhage = higher recovery rates
Schaefer et al., 1992
Bondurant et al., 1990;	No relationship betwixt hemorrhage size and recovery
Flanders et al., 1996
PRESENCE OF EDEMA
Flanders et al., 1996	Edema = prognosis of recovery to functional levels (D/E)
Ramón et al., 1997	Edema = association with incomplete syndromes
SIZE OF EDEMA
Flanders et al., 1990;	Degree of edema is inversely proportional to initial impairment and future recovery
Flanders et al., 1996;
Ramón et al., 1997
Boldin et al., 2006; Flanders et al., 1990	Multiple levels involvement = poorer prognosis and greater chance of consummate lesions
Flanders et al., 1996	Involvement of merely 1 to 3 segments = improved prognosis

Before the advent of MRI, there were no imaging methods to appraise the severity of traumatic SCI. MRI provides a rapid non-invasive ways of evaluating the condition of spinal cord parenchyma and depicting the injured spinal string and accurately showing the extent of macroscopic damage (Yamashita et al., 1991). Information technology should be noted, yet, that to the all-time of our knowledge, no study examined the relationship between MRI aspect and walking recovery, but simply with neurologic recovery (AIS course conversion) that is only partially related to walking (see above).

For prognostic purposes the T2 sagittal images seem to be the most useful ones, while T1 and axial images practise not correlate with the prognosis (Bozzo et al., 2011). A damaged spinal string exhibits a variable amount of intramedullary hemorrhage and edema. Both the presence of these ii features and the amount of parenchyma that is afflicted by hemorrhage and edema are directly related to the degree of initial neurologic arrears and to the prognosis (Bondurant et al., 1990; Flanders et al., 1990). Based on these aspects, Bondurant and associates (Bondurant et al., 1990) proposed a classification which consider four different MRI patterns: Design ane shows a normal MRI signal in the string; blueprint 2 represents single-level edema; pattern 3 is multi-level edema; and pattern 4 is mixed hemorrhage and edema.

Nearly studies showed that patients with spinal string hemorrhage volition have decreased motor ability, lower motor recovery rates, and fewer muscles with useful part, i year after injury in comparison with subjects with small, non-hemorrhagic lesions (Bondurant et al., 1990; Flemish region et al., 1990, 1996; Yamashita et al., 1991; Schaefer et al., 1992; Marciello et al., 1993; Sato et al., 1994; Ramón et al., 1997); hemorrhage on initial MRI (inside fifteen days from the lesion) is associated with a complete injury in virtually 100% of the patients (Ramón et al., 1997). If no hemorrhage is seen on initial MRI, patients will have an incomplete lesion and take a significantly better prognosis for motor recovery in the upper and lower extremities, also as comeback in their Frankel and/or ASIA impairment scale classification (Schaefer et al., 1992).

Information technology is unclear whether the size of the hemorrhage is a prognostic feature. Some authors (Flemish region et al., 1990; Schaefer et al., 1992; Boldin et al., 2006) take shown that small-scale hemorrhages may offer higher recovery rates; others showed no difference based on the size of the hemorrhage (Bondurant et al., 1990; Flemish region et al., 1996).

With regard to spinal cord edema, this MRI finding seems to take a adept prognostic value. In incomplete SCIs, the finding of edema in MRI is associated with a good prognosis of neurological recovery (Flanders et al., 1996). Furthermore, the incomplete syndromes, such as the Brown-Sèquard syndrome, seem to exist associated with the edema blueprint (Ramón et al., 1997). Withal, if the edema involves multiple levels, it tends to be associated with a poorer prognosis and a greater chance of having a complete lesion (Flanders et al., 1996; Boldin et al., 2006). If the string edema is limited to one to three segments simply, then the lesion is ordinarily milder in nature, with an improved prognosis (Bauer and Errico, 1991).

Based on the classification of Bondurant et al. (1990), Bozzo et al. (2011) reviewed the information of several articles (Schaefer et al., 1992; Shimada and Tokioka, 1999; Andreoli et al., 2005) and constitute a correlation with the AIS conversion of patients. Every bit already reported hemorrhage is the more severe MRI aspect, with about 95% of patients remaining with the same AIS course of admission examination. Patients with diffuse edema besides showed a poor improvement, as only 28% of them showed an comeback of AIS grade. Conversely, patients with unmarried level edema pattern showed a skillful neurological consequence as 90% of them improved for a mean of 1.9 AIS grades.

Other positive correlations have been described: greater degree of cord pinch, greater caste of canal compromise, and the severity of soft tissue injuries seem to be all associated with poorer neurological outcomes (Flanders et al., 1996; Selden et al., 1999; Dai and Jia, 2000; Miyanji et al., 2007; Song et al., 2008).

Treatment

In the last decade several interventions aiming at reducing the spinal cord impairment (neuroprotection) have been proposed (Becker and McDonald, 2012). However, these interventions are still at an experimental level (Becker and McDonald, 2012). Therefore, in the post-obit paragraphs we volition focus but on the use and efficacy of high dose methylprednisolone (which, although questioned, is still the nigh widely used pharmacological treatment in the acute phase of SCI) and of early surgical intervention. It should be noticed that in both cases, studies referred to neurological comeback rather than to walking recovery. Therefore, information on the efficacy of these treatments on airing are non available.

Methylprednisolone

The administration of loftier-dose methylprednisolone (MP) to patients with spinal cord injuries has been reported in the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Studies (NASCIS, NASCIS-II, and NASCIS-III) (Bracken et al., 1984, 1990, 1997). Since and then, the utilise of MP increased and became a standard of care for acute traumatic SCIs (Hurlbert, 2001). It has been hypothesized that MP attenuates the inflammatory cascade and lessens lipid peroxidation, thus decreasing secondary Spinal String damage (Delamarter et al., 1995). In the NASCIS studies, the 24 and 48 h administration of high dose MP produced an of import neurologic recovery (AIS class improvement) paralleled by a functional amelioration (Bracken et al., 1997). Withal, several recent revisions of NASCIS protocols and other randomized trials questioned the efficacy of steroids administration to achieve a neurologic comeback (Hurlbert, 2001; Matsumoto et al., 2001; Suberviola et al., 2008; Bydon et al., 2013). Furthermore, the 48-h–infusion of MP seems to exist associated with an increased risk of pneumonia, sepsis, gastrointestinal bleeding, and steroid myopathy (Pointillart et al., 2000; Quian et al., 2004).

Based on these evidences, both the Consortium for Spinal String Medicine clinical practice guidelines (Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine, 2007) and the neurosurgical guidelines (2002) consider the employ of high-dose MP to be a handling pick rather than a standard.

Surgery trials

The undisputed benefits of surgical treatment for unstable vertebral injuries include decreased hospital stay, fewer sequelae from prolonged immobilization, and more than rapid admission to the rehabilitation arrangement (Raineteau and Schwab, 2001).

Despite these evidence, the timing of decompression of the neural elements, and, in particular, the efficacy of early decompression (inside 24 h) in improving neurologic recovery is nonetheless a matter of debate (Fehlings and Tator, 1999; Fehlings and Perrin, 2005). A meta-analysis of studies of early decompression from 1966 through 2000 (La Rosa et al., 2004), showed that surgery performed within 24 h produced a significant comeback in neurological recovery compared with belatedly surgery, but concluded that the show was not stiff and that early surgery could be considered only as a exercise option.

Starting from this framework, a recent prospective multicentric study (Fehlings et al., 2012) demonstrated that the odds of achieving a ii AIS grade improvement is 2.8 times higher in patients undergoing early surgical decompression (within 24 h). However, a recent meta-assay (van Middendorp et al., 2013) reported a lack of statistical robustness of the articles examined, therefore the relationship between early on surgery and ameliorate neurological outcome is still to exist demonstrated.

Discussion

This review demonstrates that the chance of walking recovery subsequently a SCI can exist accurately predicted on the base of demographic data and clinical examination. Patients with complete sensory-motor lesions have very limited possibility of achieving walking role at follow up, and too if they are able to ambulate they usually are "limited ambulators." The chances of walking recovery meliorate in less severe lesions, every bit demonstrated by AIS B and C subjects. AIS B patients can recover walking especially if their clinical picture shows a less severe involvement of the spinal string (light touch and pinprick conservation = some sparing of the spino-thalamic and posterior columns tracts = higher possibility of cortico-spinal tracts preservation). Finally, subjects with AIS C lesions are bound to walk, especially the younger ones. This prognosis for walking may exist sustained and empowered by instrumental examinations that help to assess the severity of the lesion and, in some cases (SSEPs and MEPs) are directly correlated with walking function.

The need to predict outcome based on expected neurological recovery and associated functional recovery has been emphasized as essential for health care planning (Ditunno, 1999) and this need is partially unmet.

During the showtime few days after SCI, definitive management strategies are formulated, which often include aggressive surgical decompression of the spinal cord (Wilson et al., 2012). This is too the fourth dimension of greatest ache for an injured patient and their family equally they face significant prognostic uncertainty. A precise noesis of the prognosis makes it possible to respond questions regarding function that patients usually inquire after spinal string injury: "Will I walk again?" and "What will I be able to do?" Furthermore, in countries with health care systems based on insurance, rehabilitation professionals take to justify and fight for appropriate services; furthermore they have to know how to allocate resource. Therefore, predicting recovery has become a rehabilitative imperative (Ditunno, 1999).

Finally, ameliorate knowledge of the course and prognosis of recovery after SCI and an understanding of the underlying mechanisms would help in the development of strategies and treatments to enhance neurological recovery. The number of interventions, therapies, and devices that have been adult and proposed to improve functional outcomes afterwards SCI is enormous; several of these proposal volition undergo clinical trials in the about future. Some early stage SCI clinical trials have recently been started and some experimental therapies take been introduced into clinical practise without a clinical trial existence completed. Prognostic data are essential to evaluate the efficacy of new drugs and therapies (for case to distinguish between the natural recovery and the effect of treatments) and to projection the clinical trials (for example to calculate the number of patients needed to obtain statistical ability) (Fawcett et al., 2006).

Limitations

This article has several limitations due to the nature of the works examined. Some of them are based on modest sample sizes and the definition of walking office and of follow upwards time points vary across the studies. Furthermore, these articles mainly correspond the experience from Us and, in part, Europe. Therefore, they do not reflect the whole world standards of care. As SCI direction may differ in different geographical areas, the rates of recovery of walking could vary to. Finally, the distribution in time of the works examined is not regular. Although the study of the prognostic factors is nevertheless a matter of interest, most of the articles related to clinical factors date back to the 80 southward and 90 s. Some prognostic factors may modify over time as SCI management evolves. Based on these limitations the results of these studies could not be necessarily generalizable Even so, the factors that we examined here are still considered the base of the prognosis of SCI consequence (Burns et al., 2012).

Funding

Supported in part past grant RC12G of the Italian Ministry of Health and grant P133 of the International Foundation for Research in Paraplegia to Giorgio Scivoletto.

Disharmonize of involvement statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of whatever commercial or fiscal relationships that could be construed as a potential disharmonize of interest.

References

• (2002). Management of astute central cervical spinal cord injuries. Neurosurgery 50(3 Suppl), S166–S172 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Aalfs C. M., Koelman J. H., Meyjes F. E., de Visser B. W. O. (1993). Posterior tibial and sural nerve somatosensory evoked potentials: a study in spastic paraparesis in spinal cord lesions. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 89, 437–441 10.1016/0168-5597(93)90118-9 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Aito Due south., D'Andrea Grand., Werhagen Fifty., Farsetti L., Cappelli Southward., Bandini B., et al. (2006). Neurological and functional outcome in traumatic cardinal cord syndrome. Spinal Cord 45, 292–297 10.1038/sj.sc.3101944 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• American Spinal Injury Association. (2000). International standards for neurological classifications of spinal cord Injury (revised). Chicago, IL: American Spinal Injury Association [Google Scholar]
• Andreoli C., Colaiacomo K. C., Rojas Beccaglia G., Di Biasi C., Casciani Eastward., Gualdi One thousand. (2005). MRI in the astute phase of spinal cord traumatic lesions: Relationship between MRI findings and neurological event. Radiol. Med. 110, 636–645 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Bauer R. D., Errico T. J. (1991). Cervical spine injuries, in Spinal Trauma, eds Errico T. J., Bauer R. D., Waugh T. (Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott; ), 71–121 [Google Scholar]
• Becker D., McDonald J. West., third. (2012). Approaches to repairing the damaged spinal cord: overview. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 109, 445–461 10.1016/B978-0-444-52137-8.00028-0 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bohlman H. H. (1979). Acute fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. An analysis of three hundred hospitalized patients and review of the literature. J. Bone Articulation Surg. Am. 61, 1119–1142 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Boldin C., Raith J., Fankhauser F., Haunschmid C., Schwantzer G., Schweighofer F. (2006). Predicting neurologic recovery in cervical spinal cord injury with postoperative MR imaging. Spine 31, 554–559 10.1097/01.brs.0000201274.59427.a4 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bondurant F. J., Cotler H. B., Kulkarni Grand. V., McArdle C. B., Harris J. H. (1990). Astute spinal string injury: a study using physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 15, 161–168 10.1097/00007632-199003000-00002 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bozzo A., Marcoux J., Radhakrishna Thousand., Pelletier J., Goulet B. (2011). The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of acute spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma 28, 1401–1411 10.1089/neu.2009.1236 [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bracken M. B., Collins W. F., Freeman D. F., Shepard M. J., Wagner F. Due west., Silten R. One thousand., et al. (1984). Efficacy of methylprednisolone in astute spinal cord injury. JAMA 251, 45–52 10.1001/jama.1984.03340250025015 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bracken M. B., Shepard 1000. J., Collins Due west. F., Holford T. R., Young W., Baskin D. Due south., et al. (1990). A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-string injury. Results of the second national acute spinal cord injury report. N. Engl. J. Med. 322, 1405–1411 x.1056/NEJM199005173222001 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bracken G. B., Shepard M. J., Holford T. R., Leo-Summers L., Aldrich Eastward. F., Fazl Thou., et al. (1997). Administration of methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 hours or tirilazad mesylate for 48 hours in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Results of the third national astute spinal cord injury randomized controlled trial. national acute spinal cord injury study. JAMA 277, 1597–1604 10.1001/jama.1997.03540440031029 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Brown-Sequard C. East. (1868). Lectures on the physiology and pathology of the central nervous organisation and the handling of organic nervous angel. Lancet 2, 593–595, 659–662, 755–757, 821–823. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)52465-10 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Buchan A. C., Fulford 1000. E., Jellineck Due east., Kerr W. M., Newsam J. E., Stark G. D. (1972). A preliminary survey of the incidence and etiology of spinal paralysis. Paraplegia 10, 23–28 10.1038/sc.1972.5 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Burns A. S., Marino R. J., Flanders A. E., Flett H. (2012). Clinical diagnosis and prognosis following spinal cord injury. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 109, 47–62 10.1016/B978-0-444-52137-eight.00003-6 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Burns S. P., Golding D. G., Rolle Westward. A., Jr., Graziani V., Ditunno J. F. (1997). Recovery of ambulation in motor incomplete tetraplegia. Curvation. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 78, 1169–1172 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90326-nine [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bydon M., Lin J., Macki M., Gokaslan Z. L., Bydon A. (2013). The current role of steroids in astute spinal cord injury. World Neurosurg. [Epub alee of print]. 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.02.062 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Celani Grand. G., Spizzichino L., Ricci S., Zampolini M., Franceschini One thousand. (2001). Spinal cord injury in Italy: a multicenter retrospective study. Curvation. Phys. Med. Rehab. 82, 589–596 ten.1053/apmr.2001.21948 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Chabot R., York D. H., Watts C., Waugh Due west. A. (1985). Somatosensory evoked potentials evaluated in normal subjects in spinal string injured patients. J. Neurosurg. 63, 544–551 ten.3171/jns.1985.63.4.0544 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Cheshire W. E., Santos C. C., Massey Due east. W., Howard J. E. (1996). Spinal string infarction: etiology and outcome. Neurology 47, 321–330 10.1212/WNL.47.2.321 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Citterio A., Franceschini M., Spizzichino L., Reggio A., Rossi B., Stampacchia G. (2004). Nontraumatic spinal cord injury: an Italian survey. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 1483–1487 x.1016/j.apmr.2003.09.028 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. (2007). Early Astute Management in Adults with Spinal Cord Injury: a Clinical Practice Guideline for Health-Care Providers. Washington, DC: Paralyzed Veterans of America [Google Scholar]
• Crozier K. S., Cheng L. L., Graziani V., Zorn Grand., Herbison One thousand., Ditunno J. F., Jr. (1992). Spinal cord injury: prognosis for ambulation based on quadriceps recovery. Paraplegia thirty, 762–767 ten.1038/sc.1992.147 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Crozier G. S., Graziani V., Ditunno J. F., Jr., Herbison G. J. (1991). Spinal cord injury: prognosis for ambulation based on sensory examination in patients who are initially motor complete. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 72, 119–121 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Curt A., Dietz V. (1997). Ambulatory capacity in spinal cord injury: significance of somatosensory evoked potentials and ASIA protocols in predicting effect. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 78, 39–43 ten.1016/S0003-9993(97)90007-1 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Curt A., Keck Grand. E., Dietz Five. (1998). Functional outcome following spinal cord injury: significance of motor-evoked potentials and ASIA scores. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 79, 81–86 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90213-1 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Dai L., Jia L. (2000). Central cord injury complicating acute cervical disc herniation in trauma. Spine 25, 331–335 ten.1097/00007632-200002010-00012 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Delamarter R. B., Sherman J., Carr J. B. (1995). Pathophysiology of spinal cord injury: recovery after immediate and delayed pinch. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 77, 1042–1049 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• DiGiovanna A. M. (2000). Human Ageing: Biological Perspectives, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Companies [Google Scholar]
• Ditunno J. F. (1999). The John Stanley Coulter Lecture. Predicting recovery afterward spinal cord injury: a rehabilitation imperative. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. fourscore, 361–364 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Ditunno J. F., Scivoletto G., Patrick 1000., Biering-Sorensen F., Abel R., Marino R. (2008b). Validation of the walking alphabetize for spinal cord injury in a Usa and European clinical population. Spinal String 46, 181–188 10.1038/sj.sc.3102071 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Ditunno P. L., Patrick Thousand., Stineman Yard., Ditunno J. F. (2008a). Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional report. Spinal Cord. 46, 500–506 10.1038/sj.sc.3102172 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Domingo A., Al-Yahya A. A., Asiri Y., Eng J. J., Tania Lam T., Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence Inquiry Squad. (2012). A systematic review of the effects of pharmacological agents on walking part in people with spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma 29, 865–879 10.1089/neu.2011.2052 [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Dvorak K. F., Fisher C. G., Hoekema J., Boyd M., Noonan V., Wing P. C., et al. (2005). Factors Predicting motor recovery and functional outcome later on traumatic central cord syndrome a long-term follow-up. Spine 30, 2303–2311 10.1097/01.brs.0000182304.35949.11 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Fawcett J. W., Brusk A., Steeves J. D., Coleman W. P., Tuszynski M. H., Lammertse D., et al. (2006). Guidelines for the bear of clinical trials for spinal cord injury every bit developed past the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery later on spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials. Spinal Cord 45, 190–205 10.1038/sj.sc.3102007 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Fehlings M. G., Perrin R. M. (2005). The role and timing of early decompression for cervical spine injury: update with a review of the recent clinical evidence. Injury 36(Suppl. 2), B13–B26 10.1016/j.injury.2005.06.011 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Fehlings Thousand. G., Tator C. H. (1999). An evidence-based review of decompressive surgery in acute spinal string injury: rationale, indications, and timing based on experimental and clinical studies. J. Neurosurg. Spine 91, 1–11 10.3171/spi.1999.91.1.0001 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Fehlings M. G., Vaccaro A., Wilson J. R., Singh A. W., Cadotte D., Harrop J. Due south., et al. (2012). Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Written report (STASCIS). PLoS One 7:e32037 ten.1371/journal.pone.0032037 [PMC costless article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Flanders A. E., Schaefer D. Chiliad., Doan H. T., Mishkin M. M., Gonzalez C. F., Northrup B. Eastward. (1990). Acute cervical spine trauma: correlation of MR imaging findings with degree of neurologic deficit. Radiology 177, 25–33 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Flanders A. Eastward., Spettell C. Chiliad., Tartaglino L. G., Friedman D. P., Herbison G. J. (1996). Forecasting motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury: value of MR imaging. Radiology 201, 649–655 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Foo D. (1986). Spinal cord injury in 40-four patients with cervical spondylosis. Paraplegia 24, 301–306 10.1038/sc.1986.42 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Foo D., Subrahmanyan T. S., Rossier A. B. (1981). Post-traumatic acute anterior spinal cord syndrome. Paraplegia. 19, 201–205 ten.1038/sc.1981.42 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Admirer D., Harrington G. (1984). Penetrating injury of the spinal cord. Injury sixteen, 7–8 10.1016/0020-1383(84)90101-3 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Greenwald B. D., Seel R. T., Cifu D. X., Shah A. N. (2001). Gender-related differences in acute rehabilitation lengths of stay, charges, and functional outcomes for a matched sample with spinal cord injury: a multicenter investigation. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 82, 1181–1187 10.1053/apmr.2001.24891 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Herbison G. J., Zerby S. A., Cohen Thousand. East., Marino R. J., Ditunno J. E. (1991). Motor ability difference inside the showtime two weeks post-SCI in cervical spinal string quadriplegic subjects. J. Neurotrauma 9, 373–380 ten.1089/neu.1992.9.373 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Hurlbert R. J. (2001). The part of steroids in acute spinal cord injury. An evidence-based assay. Spine 26, S39–S46 10.1097/00007632-200112151-00009 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Hussey R. Westward., Stauffer E. S. (1973). Spinal cord injury: requirements for ambulation. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 54, 544–547 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Jacobs S. R., Yeaney N. K., Herbison G. J., Ditunno J. F., Jr. (1995). Time to come ambulation prognosis every bit predicted by somatosensory evoked potentials in motor complete and incomplete quadriplegia. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 76, 635–641 x.1016/S0003-9993(95)80632-6 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Jakob Westward., Wirz M., van Hedel H. J., Dietz V., EM-SCI Study Grouping. (2009). Difficulty of elderly SCI subjects to translate motor recovery—"body function"–into daily living activities. J. Neurotrauma 26, 2037–2044 ten.1089/neu.2008.0824 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Kaplan B. J., Friedman W. A., Gavenstein D. (1985). Somatosensory evoked potential in hysterical paraplegia. Surg. Neurol. 23, 502–506 10.1016/0090-3019(85)90246-0 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Kaplan P. E., Rosen J. S. (1981). Somatosensory evoked potentials in spinal cord injured patients. Paraplegia xix, 118–122 ten.1038/sc.1981.26 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Katoh S., el Masry Due west. S. (1995). Motor recovery of patients presenting with motor paralysis and sensory sparing following cervical spinal cord injuries. Paraplegia 33, 506–509 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Katz R. T., Tolkeikis R. J., Knuth A. Due east. (1991). Somatosensory-evoked and dermatomal-evoked potentials are not clinically useful in the prognostication of acute spinal string injury. Spine xvi, 730–735 10.1097/00007632-199107000-00007 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Kirshblum S. C., O'Connor 1000. C. (1998). Predicting neurologic recovery in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Curvation. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 79, 1456–1466 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Ko H-Y., Ditunno J. F., Graziani V., Fiddling J. W. (1999). The blueprint of reflex recovery during spinal shock. Spinal Cord 37, 402–409 10.1038/sj.sc.3100840 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• La Rosa K., Conti A., Cardali S., Cacciola F., Tomasello F. (2004). Does early decompression amend neurological outcome of spinal cord injured patients? Appraisal of the literature using a meta-analytical approach. Spinal Cord 42, 503–512 10.1038/sj.sc.3101627 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Marciello Thousand., Flemish region A. East., Herbison K. J., Schaefer D. K., Friedman D. P., Lane J. I. (1993). Magnetic resonance imaging related to neurologic issue in cervical spinal cord injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 74, 940–946 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Marinho A. R., Flett H. Thou., Craven C., Ottensmeyer C. A., Parsons D., Verrier K. C. (2012). Walking-related outcomes for individuals with traumatic and non-traumatic spinal string injury inform concrete therapy practice. J. Spinal Cord Med. 35, 371–381 x.1179/2045772312Y.0000000038 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Matsumoto T., Tamaki T., Kawakami M., Yoshida Chiliad., Ando M., Yamada H. (2001). Early on complications of loftier-dose methylprednisolone sodium succinate treatment in the follow-up of astute cervical spinal cord injury. Spine 26, 426–430 10.1097/00007632-200102150-00020 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Maynard F. 1000., Glen G. R., Fountain S., Wilmot C., Hamilton R. (1979). Neurological prognosis subsequently traumatic quadriplegia. J. Neurosurg. 50, 611–616 ten.3171/jns.1979.fifty.v.0611 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Maynard F. K., Jr., Bracken M. B., Creasey K., Ditunno J. F., Jr., Donovan Due west. H., Ducker T. B., et al. (1997). International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal string injury patients (revised). Spinal Cord 35, 266–274 10.1038/sj.sc.3100432 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• McKinley W., Santos 1000., Meade M., Brooke K. (2007). Incidence and outcomes of spinal cord injury clinical syndromes. J. Spinal Cord Med. 30, 215–224 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• McKinley W. O., Huang M. E., Tewksbury G. A. (2000). Neoplastic vs. traumatic spinal string injury: an inpatient rehabilitation comparing. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 79, 138–144 10.1097/00002060-200003000-00005 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• McKinley W. O., Seel R. T., Gadi R. Chiliad., Tewksbury Grand. A. (2001). Nontraumatic vs. traumatic spinal string injury. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehab. 80, 693–699 ten.1097/00002060-200109000-00010 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Mckinley Due west. O., Tewksbury M. A., Mujteba N. Thou. (2002). Spinal stenosis vs traumatic spinal cord injury: a rehabilitation outcome comparison. J. Spinal Cord Med. 25, 28–32 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Merriam W. Due east., Taylor T. K. F., Ruff Due south. J., McPhail 1000. J. (1986). A reappraisal of acute traumatic primal cord syndrome. J. Bone Joint Surg. 68B, 708–713 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Miyanji F., Furlan J. C., Aarabi B., Arnold P. K., Fehlings M. G. (2007). Acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury: MR imaging findings correlated with neurologic outcome—prospective study with 100 sequent patients. Radiology 243, 820–827 10.1148/radiol.2433060583 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Newey M. L., Sen P. Yard., Fraser R. D. (2000). The long-term outcome after central cord syndrome: a study of the natural history. J. Os Joint Surg. Br. 82, 851–855 ten.1302/0301-620X.82B6.9866 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Oleson C. V., Burns A. S., Ditunno J. F., Geisler F. H., Coleman Westward. P. (2005). Prognostic value of pinprick preservation in motor consummate, sensory incomplete spinal cord injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 86, 988–992 x.1016/j.apmr.2004.09.031 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Pagliacci M. C., Celani K. G., Spizzichino 50., Zampolini K., Aito Southward., Citterio A., et al. (2003). Gruppo Italiano Studio Epidemiologico Mielolesioni (GISEM) Group. spinal cord lesion management in Italian republic: a 2-year survey. Spinal Cord 41, 620–628 10.1038/sj.sc.3101521 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Penrod L. E., Hegde S. K., Ditunno J. E. (1990). Age effect on prognosis for functional recovery in acute, traumatic central cord syndrome. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 71, 963–968 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Perot P. L., Vera C. L. (1982). Scalp-recorded somatosensory evoked potentials to stimulation of nerves in the lower extremities and evaluation of patients with spinal cord trauma. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 388, 359–368 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1982.tb50802.10 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Pointillart V., Petitjean M. Due east., Wiart L., Vital J. Thousand., Lassie P., Thicoipe K., et al. (2000). Pharmacological therapy of spinal string injury during the acute phase. Spinal Cord 38, 71–76 10.1038/sj.sc.3100962 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Quian T., Guo X., Levi A. D., Vanni S., Shebert R. T., Sipski 1000. L. (2004). Loftier-dose methylprednisolone may cause myopathy in acute spinal string injury patients. Spinal Cord 43, 199–203 10.1038/sj.sc.3101681 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Raineteau O., Schwab M. East. (2001). Plasticity of motor systems after incomplete spinal string injury. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 263–273 x.1038/35067570 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Ramón S., Domínguez R., Ramírez 50., Paraira M., Olona M., Castelló T., et al. (1997). Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging correlation in acute spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 35, 664–673 10.1038/sj.sc.3100490 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Roth E. J., Lawler M. H., Yarkony Chiliad. M. (1990). Traumatic central cord syndrome: clinical features and functional outcomes. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 71, 18–23 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Roth East. J., Park T., Pang T., Yarkony G. M., Lee M. Y. (1991). Traumatic cervical Brown-Sequard and Brown-Sequard plus syndromes: the spectrum of presentations and outcomes. Paraplegia 29, 582–589 x.1038/sc.1991.86 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Sato T., Kokubun S., Rijal K. P., Ojima T., Moriai Northward., Hashimoto 1000., et al. (1994). Prognosis of cervical spinal string injury in correlation with magnetic resonance imaging. Paraplegia 32, 81–85 x.1038/sc.1994.xiv [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Schaefer D. M., Flanders A. E., Osterholm J. L., Northrup B. E. (1992). Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging in the acute phase of cervical spine injury. J. Neurosurg. 76, 218–223 x.3171/jns.1992.76.2.0218 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Scivoletto G., Farchi S., Laurenza L., Molinari M. (2011). Traumatic and non-traumatic spinal string lesions: an Italian comparison of neurological and functional outcomes. Spinal Cord 49, 391–396 10.1038/sc.2010.85 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Scivoletto G., Morganti B., Ditunno P., Ditunno J. F., Molinari M. (2003). Furnishings on age on spinal cord lesion patients' rehabilitation. Spinal Cord 41, 457–464 10.1038/sj.sc.3101489 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Scivoletto M., Morganti B., Molinari Thou. (2004a). Neurologic recovery of spinal cord injury patients in Italy. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 485–489 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00766-4 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Scivoletto Grand., Morganti B., Molinari M. (2004b). Sexual practice-related differences of rehabilitation outcomes of spinal cord lesion patients. Clin. Rehabil. eighteen, 709–713 10.1191/0269215504cr749oa [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Selden N. R., Quint D. J., Patel N., D'Arcy H. Due south., Papadopoulos S. M. (1999). Emergency magnetic resonance imaging of cervical spinal cord injuries: clinical correlation and prognosis. Neurosurgery 44, 785–792 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Shimada G., Tokioka T. (1999). Sequential MR studies of cervical cord injury: correlation with neurological damage and clinical upshot. Spinal Cord 37, 410–415 10.1038/sj.sc.3100858 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Sipski One thousand. 50., Jackson A. B., Gómez-Marín O., Estores I., Stein A. (2004). Effects of gender on neurologic and functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 1826–1836 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.031 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Vocal K. J., Kim Grand. H., Lee K. B. (2008). The efficacy of the modified classification system of soft tissue injury in extension injury of the lower cervical spine. Spine 33, E488–E493 x.1097/BRS.0b013e31817b6191 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Stahlman One thousand. C., Hanley E. Due north. (1992). Surgical direction of spinal injuries, in Skeletal Trauma, eds Browner B. D., Jupiter J. B., Levine A. M., Trafton P. One thousand. (Philadelphia: WB Saunders; ), 837–860 [Google Scholar]
• Steeves J. D., Lammertse D., Curt A., Fawcett J. W., Tuszynski M. H., Ditunno J. F., et al. (2007). International campaign for cures of spinal cord injury paralysis. guidelines for the bear of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial result measures. Spinal Cord 45, 190–205 x.1038/sj.sc.3102008 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Suberviola B., Gonzalez-Castro A., Llorca J., Ortiz-Melon F., Minambres Eastward. (2008). Early complications of loftier-dose methylprednisolone in acute spinal cord injury patients. Injury 39, 748–752 ten.1016/j.injury.2007.12.005 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Vaccaro A. R., Daugherty R. J., Sheehan T. P., Dante S. J., Cotler J. M., Balderston R. A., et al. (1997). Neurologic upshot of early on versus late surgery for cervical spinal cord injury. Spine 22, 2609–2613 ten.1097/00007632-199711150-00006 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• van Middendorp J. J., Hosman A. J., Doi S. A. (2013). The furnishings of the timing of spinal surgery after traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurotrauma 30, 1781–1794 x.1089/neu.2013.2932 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• van Middendorp J. J., Hosman A. J., Donders A. R., Pouw M. H., Ditunno J. F., Jr., Brusque A., et al. (2011). A clinical prediction rule for airing outcomes after traumatic spinal string injury: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet 377, 1004–1010 10.1016/S0140-6736(ten)62276-three [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• van Middendorp J. J., Hosman A. J., Pouw M. H., EM-SCI Study Group, Van de Meent H. (2009). ASIA impairment calibration conversion in traumatic SCI: is it related with the ability to walk? A descriptive comparison with functional ambulation outcome measures in 273 patients. Spinal Cord 47, 555–560 10.1038/sc.2008.162 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Waters R. L., Adkins R. H., Yakura J. S., Sie I. (1994a). Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete tetraplegia. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 75, 306–311 ten.1016/0003-9993(94)90034-5 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Waters R. 50., Adkins R. H., Yakura J. Due south., Sie I. (1994b). Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete paraplegia. Curvation. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 75, 67–72 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90034-5 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Weinstein D. E., Ko H. Y., Graziani Five., Ditunno J. F., Jr. (1997). Prognostic significance of the delayed plantar reflex following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord Med. 20, 207–211 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Wernig A., Muller S. (1992). Laufband locomotion with torso weight back up improved walking in persons with severe spinal cord injuries. Paraplegia xxx, 229–238 10.1038/sc.1992.61 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Wilson J. R., Grossman R. G., Frankowski R. F., Kiss A., Davis A. M., Kulkarni A. Five., et al. (2012). A clinical prediction model for long-term functional outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury based on acute clinical and imaging factors. J. Neurotrauma 29, 2263–2271 x.1089/neu.2012.2417 [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Yamashita Y., Takahashi M., Matsuno Y., Kojima R., Sakamoto Y., Oguni T., et al. (1991). Acute spinal cord injury: magnetic resonance imaging correlated with myelopathy. Br. J. Radiol. 64, 201–209 10.1259/0007-1285-64-759-201 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Young J. S., Dexter West. R. (1979). Neurological recovery distal to the zone of injury in 172 cases of closed, traumatic spinal cord injury. Paraplegia sixteen, 39–49 ten.1038/sc.1978.half-dozen [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Young W. (1985). Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in spinal cord injury, in Spinal String Monitoring, eds Schranml J., Jones S. J. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag; ), 127–142 [Google Scholar]
• Ziganow Due south. (1986). Neurometric evaluation of the cortical somatosensory evoked potential in acute incomplete spinal cord injuries. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 65, 86–93 x.1016/0168-5597(86)90040-vii [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Zörner B., Blanckenhorn W. U., Dietz Five., EM-SCI Study Group, Curt A. (2010). Clinical algorithm for improved prediction of ambulation and patient stratification after incomplete spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma 27, 241–252 10.1089/neu.2009.0901 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

---

Articles from Frontiers in Human being Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

---

lippstagazen.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3952432/

Share this post